Safety & Accidents
TMI, Chernobyl, Fukushima, SL-1 and what reactor safety engineering means.
Core concepts
Chernobyl: what happened and what the toll was
ContestedA uniquely Soviet disaster that says little about modern reactors: it took an unstable design with no containment. Even history's worst accident caused far less harm than widely feared.
Fukushima Daiichi: tsunami, meltdowns, and the radiation question
ContestedA magnitude-9 quake and tsunami caused meltdowns yet no confirmed radiation deaths — a striking demonstration that nuclear is safer than our fears, and that overcaution can be its own hazard.
How reactor safety is actually engineered
Settled scienceDefense-in-depth plus modern passive safety make nuclear one of the safest forms of energy ever measured — and newer designs are safer still.
Most substantial articles
Common misconceptions
Myth: Chernobyl shows what any reactor can do.
Reality: It required a flawed Soviet design with no containment — impossible in Western reactors.
Myth: Fukushima killed thousands from radiation.
Reality: Reactor radiation caused no confirmed acute deaths; the evacuation caused the documented harm.
From Nucleation Capital
Source: Nucleation Capital✓ Active recall
1. What design feature did the Chernobyl RBMK lack that Western reactors have?
2. What caused most of the confirmed harm at Fukushima?